Friday, March 21, 2025
The Magnificent Norzang Phoobchen
Wednesday, March 19, 2025
Of Star-spangled Night Skies and Cute Little Mushrooms
Saturday, March 8, 2025
March of History: Flight Information Display System (FIDS) at Paro International Airport
Thursday, March 6, 2025
Few of Bhutan's Cute Little Birds
Monday, February 24, 2025
12 of Over 1,900++
The following are 12 of the moths I photographed in Dechencholing areas of Thimphu in the past 6 months.
ENJOY!
Thursday, January 30, 2025
Recording History: No Casual Matter
Is the image on the obverse of the coin really a Neoli (mongoose)?
I am inclined to believe that the image is most likely that of a Neoli. The reason is that the Neoli depicted on the obverse of the Neoli Maartang is shown spewing Norbu (jewels). This is how the Neoli is portrayed on the Bhutanese/Tibetan Thangka - being held in the left arm of the Buddhist mythical God of Wealth—the Zambalha, as seen below:
Thangka painting of Zambalha, the God of Wealth.
Given the uncommon design of the Neoli Coin, I am also doubtful that the coin is really a coin. Can it be that it is not a coin but an Exonumia?
Exonumia are numismatic items that include all kinds of coin-like items, but are not actual coins; they are not issued to serve as money nor are they used in monetary transections. They are rarely, if ever, issued by national governments. They are more popularly known as Temple Tokens. Many countries and cultures around the world produce them. In India, where our coins originate, most of these coin lookalikes are called Ramtanka. The following are some examples of exonumia:
Exonumia from India and France
Here's another telling fact: the Neoli Coin has a monolithic front with one solitary image on its obverse—unlike all Bhutanese coins, which bear multiple figures/motifs/alphabets on both their obverse and reverse, as seen here:
Traditional design of Bhutanese coins. All of them have multiple motifs/alphabets/conjuncts — both on the obverse as well as on the reverse.
The coin collector and historian Mr. Nicholas Rhodes, in one of his journals titled “Coinage in Bhutan” which was submitted to the Centre for Bhutan Studies, asserts that the Neoli Coin may have been struck at Bhutan House, Kalimpong by the Dorji family. He writes:
Machine struck coin's Edge & Rim.
I know of no other Bhutanese coin – other than the Neoli Coin that is under discussion here that bear the image of mongoose on it. But Mr. Wolfgang Bertsch of Germany, recognized as one of the most established historians and collector of Tibetan currency brought to my notice that Tibet did issue a coin that bore the image of a pair of mongooses on it:
The Tibetan 10 Srang coin issued in 1950 bearing, what is believed to be, a pair of mongooses on its reverse. The above coin is in the collection of retired Ambassador Tobgye Sonam Dorji
So where does all this confusion lead me? As of now, I am undecided as to what the Neoli Maartang really is: a coin or an exonumia. I will have to wait and see if more substantive findings emerge in the coming months and years. Until the matter is settled, I will be content to simply admire the Neoli Coin’s beauty, history—and mystery.
Saturday, December 28, 2024
A Foot Soldier Without Compare
For me, as I confessed to some close family members, the sadness was not in the fact that his life had come to an end, but that it was snuffed out by the same beings in whose cause Dasho Wangda was set to do battle. The problem of wild elephants in the Special Administrative Region of the Gelephu Mindfulness City has been hanging fire for decades. Even as the Royal Government of Bhutan was aware of the increasingly aggressive animals who had lost their natural habitat, it has done little to resolve the issue.
When I last spoke to Dasho Wangda on Friday the 13th December, 2024 (he was on his way to Bhangtar, in eastern Bhutan), he said that he hoped to sit with me when he came up to Thimphu to participate in one of the events during the National Day celebrations. He wanted us to jointly fine-tune a proposal that he would soon be submitting to the RGoB—a bold and daring proposal that laid out a mindful solution to the dangerous situation brewing between the people domiciled within GeSAR and the burgeoning wild elephant population. It was a document that truly lived up to the values our country espouses.
To be sure, the RGoB did us all proud by honoring Dasho Wangda with a fitting send-off. In doing so, it demonstrated that it will not be found wanting in its duty to those who are deserving. But will the official response end there?
It may sound strange, but I am wont to believe that Dasho Wangda’s untimely death was an act contrived by Providence. Almighty God may have decided that the only way to get Bhutanese authorities to wake up and act was by engineering a devastating tragedy of this scale.
But what will change going forward? Will the government finally take action on this chronic and perilous problem? Or will Dasho Wangda’s ultimate sacrifice be in vain?