A Goat In Place Of A Sheep

The proverbial storm in the tea cup is yet again brewing with the customary zeal – the spirited ado about nothing!

Bhutan’s fourth elections is days away and the nation is abuzz with a million inconsequential questions: Who do you think is going to win? Are you voting? Who are you going to vote for this time? Do you think Dr. Lotay is likely to come back? So forth and so on ……

The five political parties and their promises

Most offer the view that the PDP will most likely emerge as the winning horse. Their logic: people believe that the vote bank of their traditional rival – the DPT – would have been halved and quartered by the two new political parties entering the fray. However, they say that PDP had better pray hard that the DPT does not end up in the final round – the DPT emerging from their ten years of having been made to languish in the Bardo (purgatory) could very well curdle the milk for them.

Others think that the Southern voters will be the king makers given their astuteness and remarkable capability to think collectively - they think objectively while the rest of the Bhutanese tend to be sentimental about their choices.

As for me, I remain unimpressed – for me it would be nothing more than a goat in place of a sheep, or vise-versa. As long as the Captain of the Ship has the rudder firmly within His grip, things should trot along reasonably OK. My worry is something else.

In 2018 when rumor was rife that Dasho Chhewang Rinzin, the incumbent Managing Director of DGPC was joining politics, I gawked. I promptly went to see him. Sitting across the table and sipping black tea, I asked him:

“I understand that Dasho is joining politics. Is that true?”

He said; “Yes, you heard it right - I am told that such a rumor is doing the rounds in certain circles.”

“Are you? But why? I mean, look behind you. The Bura Marp and the Patang hanging behind you are the symbols of the highest honor any person can hope for. What more can you hope to achieve? What greater honor can there be – above and beyond that which you are already decorated with?

I agree that we need good and capable people in the political arena. But that is not to say that the bureaucracy should be drained of them. We need equally capable and dedicated people in the civil service – after all you are the ones who will implement the plans and programs conceived by the political leadership. We need people with strong character in the civil service – people who have the wherewithal to implement and carry forward the plans and programs; people who can ably keep the politicians in the straight and the narrow.

Why is it important that the smartest and the brightest must join politics? Isn't the bureaucracy important?

Afterall, when the dream merchants have dusted and gone – when the winning horse has galloped away with the booty, you will still be around - to try and mop up the bloodied floor and pick up the litter of carcasses - to give hope that there will be another day – a new day when renewed attempts can be made to mend and patch the broken promises – when new dreams can be dreamed, if only to be broken, yet again.

US Election Results: Dark Forces Will Be Unleashed

An American friend in USA sent me the following mail this morning:
.........................................

Hi Yeshey —

My friends and I are absolutely devastated by the US election. It is beyond belief.

I live in a very liberal city. We never considered that the vote could go toward such a malign, psychopathic candidate. The analogy to Hitler is not far-fetched -- dark forces will be unleashed, for sure. The US is ruinously divided at the moment (Hillary Clinton actually won the popular vote), and there are already protests underway. I have never feared for the country and for the planet as much as I do now. You should know that Trump is stridently against one of the issues that you are passionate about: environmental conservation.

.........................................

 
We all agree that Donald Trump winning the US elections was something totally unexpected. But by now we know that Americans tend to do the unexpected, once in a while.

According to many, Mr. Trump is supposed to be the vilest of all the evil in the world. I am a little intrigued though. It is simply impossible that millions of supposedly educated people in the world’s most advanced country would elect such a supposedly evil person, to govern and lead them. Something is amiss here. May be the American people know something that we don't.

But one thing is for sure - we should all be concerned - what America does and how it behaves, impacts us all. As the self-elected custodians of world order and morality, the American people should understand that they have a responsibility to the rest of the human race, beyond their borders. Fortunately the American democracy is mature enough and there are checks and balances in place, that would prevent any modern day Hitler a free hand to dismantle all that their past 44 Presidents have built and worked for.

Now that all the election posturing is behind him, may be Mr. Trump will surprise us all by NOT delivering on most of the promises he made during his election campaigns.

My Felicitations To PDP And The New Cabinet

As I had said in one of my earlier posts, I was in a dilemma as to how to appropriately word my  बधाइयां  - to the winning candidates of the 2013 elections - without rubbing salt to injury. The PDP will form the next government - but I doubt that the taste of victory is as sweet as it would have been - had they been allowed the opportunity to win the elections - based on their own merits. Deep down, they cannot help but feel a sense of hollowness - because their victory has been served to them on a platter. In all fairness, no one should doubt that the PDP could have won the elections on the strength of their own worth but the blatant show of hand by the government of India must surely leave a bitter after-taste.

Regardless of what happened, the election results are out and there is no reversing it. The PDP will form the next government and they will direct the affairs of the country for the next five years. Therefore, it is time that we move forward and not be marooned in the quagmire of hurt and resentment. Thus, I would like to offer them my felicitations with the following salutations:

चुनाव जीतने के लिए चुने जाने पर बधाई!

(Congratulations on being chosen to win the elections!)

I would also like to wish the VERY BEST OF LUCK TO THE NEW CABINET comprising of the following Ministers who will most likely receive their Namzha and Pata tomorrow from His Majesty the King.

I have only one regret - the cabinet has no representation from my Dzongkhag. Thus, as in the past, I suspect that Khengrig Ngyamsum will continue to be neglected.

The "Acho" Factor

On my earlier post titled “A Political Coup Without Parallel!” dated June 17, 2013, I had wondered:

“What is the possibility of an “Acho” factor behind one or some of our political parties?”

Developments since then have confirmed beyond doubt that my fears were not unfounded. It turns out that there was/is indeed an Acho’s hand behind the outcome of our elections.

To be frank, I am glad that the Acho is the same old Acho from the south. This is an Acho we have lived with for the past more than five decades - we are pretty much familiar with their idiosyncrasies, their curry smell and their shinny sleek hair greased with coconut oil. I believe that this Acho is a more pliable beast to go to bed with. In all probability it will rape us in broad daylight - as it is doing now with the hydro-power projects - yet it is unlikely to fatally stab us in the back. I have been, and still remain grateful, for their hand in our development programs. Some of my very best friends are from the land of our bungling Acho.

However, my worry now is that I hope this does not become a standard bad habit among our political parties - that of acquiring Achos to win elections.What is the possibility that the next election will not see the emergence of yet another Acho - one that is currently watching from the shadows with raised eyebrows? - the lumbering hulk of an Acho - one from the North?

I am disturbed by what Sunanda K. Datta-Ray, perhaps the most authoritative Bhutan watcher and commentator, writes:

“If one bunch of Bhutanese politicians leans towards India, another is bound to lean towards China. Given the fragility of Sino-Indian relations, this polarization is not in Bhutan’s interest. It is even less in India’s interest for the Bhutanese to have to face such a choice”.

The full text of Mr. Datta-Ray’s writing is available at:

http://www.telegraphindia.com/1130720/jsp/opinion/story_17134356.jsp#.UevvF1NzpT4

NOTE: “Acho” is the Bhutanese equivalent of “Sugar Daddy” in the Western concept.

New Delhi Announces Bhutan 2013 Election Results

Bhutan’s 2013 General Elections was hijacked by India. When that became apparent to me, I withdrew my participation in the electoral process by refusing to cast my vote on the polling day. I came to the conclusion that whichever way people voted, the result would be the same. I wanted no part of it and made my stand clear through my post on this Blog titled “2013 General Elections: India is Victorious”.

Twenty-eight readers commented - most of them accused me of being pro-DPT. There was nothing useful about those comments and thus, I refused to post them - except for one, which had been already posted, and it would have been rude to delete it.

I believe that the result of the 2013 General Elections was decided and manipulated in New Delhi - months, if not years, before our election process began. Someone else - a reader of the BBS website too seem to have understood this. He/she commented; “In this election we were looking for a new Prime Minister - instead we ended up getting a Chief Minister”. Not the exact words but something on those lines.

New Delhi already knew the outcome of the elections. That is evident from the following letter of felicitation sent by the Indian Prime Minister to the PDP President. Dr. Man Mohan Singh had already announced Bhutan’s election results on the 13th of July, 2013 when our own Election Commission could finish compiling the results and announce it only a day later - on the 14th July, 2013.

I am currently going through a dilemma - I have not been able to congratulate a single winning candidate or offer my sympathies to the losing ones. For the life of me, I cannot decide how to phrase my words?

Congratulations on your win? – NOT TRUE!

My sympathies on your loss? – NOT TRUE BY A LONG SHOT!

Not a drop of even a cent in Chhukha revenue, assures V.P. Haran

I thought that the BBS had misquoted the Indian Ambassador. Upon playing the video clip (http://www.bbs.bt/news/elections2013/?p=27065) that was posted underneath the news article, I realized that he had been quoted verbatim. There is no mistake.

So, Ambassador Haran, can we hear it once more, please? This time without the slip-up, if it was not intended.

2013 General Elections: India is Victorious

Few would have been as passionate as me - in the electoral process that began in April and ended yesterday. But at the end, for me, it all came to naught - because I choose not to cast my vote yesterday - the polling day of the 2013 General Elections. The party I support may have lost one vote - my vote - but I am a happy man nonetheless - because I will not be carrying the burden of guilt on my conscience - for the part I would have played in the election’s final outcome, had I cast my vote. Years from now, when the history of our democracy will be written, I do not want posterity to record me as one among hundreds of thousands who participated in this darkest of dark elections.

Elections are held primarily to offer the people an opportunity to exercise their fundamental right to vote and, through that process, to elect a government of their choice. Sadly though, towards the final days to the run up to the polling day, it became clear to me that the 2013 General Elections wasn’t going to be about the free and fair exercise of the will of the people of Bhutan. Thus, as of 1st July, I decided to stop writing anything related to elections.

This election belonged to India. And they won.

But there are some who tell me that India’s win is Bhutanese people’s win. That the party India preferred was victorious would mean that India would no longer twist our arms into surrender and subservience. That India will double and triple their aid money to us, that they will reinstate the subsidies that have been withdrawn; that they will increase the power tariff that is currently under negotiation. That they will give us Boleros, helicopters, farm tractors and that they will inject billions into our banks to revive and reinvigorate commercial lending to businesses and industries and aspiring car owners. That the Indian Rupee shortage would be a thing of the past!

All that promise of plenty is certainly tempting and surely some of us have been tempted. Whether it is worth pawning off our souls in return - for another five years - is a decision that seems to be out of our hands. Others have already made that decision on our behalf. Now let us wait and see if India will deliver all that they have promised. The world will be our witness.

For the moment, let us give the benefit of doubt to the doomsday soothsayers.

For the benefit of my overseas readers, I am happy to upload the following 2013 General Election Results. The 15 constituencies where the DPT won is marked in yellow.

Bhutan's Road to Democracy: II

The Indian reporter Sachin Parashar’s article in the Times of India (ToI) titled “Bhutan’s road to democracy leads to China?” has received unnecessary attention among the Bhutanese - mainly because some of the People’s Democratic Party (PDP) candidates has used it as a platform to launch an attack on their political rival - the Druk Phuensum Tshogpa (DPT). The point being made is that the article is proof that the erstwhile DPT government has jeopardized Indo-Bhutan relations.

It is rather unfortunate. The fact that it is being raised at this critical juncture in the General Elections is clearly a shortsighted play by the PDP to gain some political points over their opponent. In making this a campaign issue, the PDP has crossed, what the Indians would call, the Lakshman Rekha. I cannot understand what their desperation is. This is an issue very few of their candidates can talk on or write about, authoritatively. The subject is way out of their league. More importantly, the PDP chose to drum up hysteria over this issue - by every one of their candidates - in every Common Forum since 26th June - based on a very uneducated and poorly written article by a reporter of no repute. There is something fishy about the timing of the article and the manner in which the PDP keeps harping on an article that is not worth a sideways glace.

Both Bhutan and India understands the consequences of a strained relation that has been nurtured and sustained over the past six decades. Ours is a relationship that is without parallel. This is not a one-sided relationship but one that is based on respect for each other - a relationship that is both mutually fulfilling and beneficial.

When every other country in the neighborhood is happily playing the China card against India, Bhutan remains the last country in South Asia that is resolutely pro-India. Since the early 50’s, Bhutan has remained a steadfast friend of India. Our future is so entwined with that of India’s that it would be impossible to imagine a future without India by our side - as our mentor, partner and benefactor. India has never failed us and, despite what some unknown reporter in India might write, despite what some irresponsible reporters in Bhutan might write, India will remain firmly behind us. It is in their interest to do so.

India has always depended on Bhutan to be there - in their hour of need. It is not very often that India needs our help - but when they do, we did not fail them - every time. Take, for instance, the case of their Republic Day Celebrations this year.

The Sultan of Oman was supposed to be the Chief Guest during the celebrations. However, because of some bungling by the bureaucrats, the invitation to the Head of State was handled inappropriately - resulting in a humiliating rebuff from Muscat. In desperation, India turned to Bhutan - in an effort to salvage a most humiliating and disastrous situation. Disregarding established protocol, His Majesty Jigme Khesar Namgyal Wangchuk readily accepted to stand in for the Sultan of Oman.

The trust is not one-sided. India’s trust in Bhutan is explicit as well. That is evidenced by the level of their investment in the country. Nepal’s hydropower potential is almost double that of Bhutan’s and yet, Bhutan is where India chose to invest. Politicians should be careful not to jeopardize a bond and relationship that has been built over many decades.

Please keep this issue out of the election campaign trail!

.............. To Be Continued

Bhutan's Road to Democracy: I

Day-before-yesterday, during the Common Forum of Lamgong-Wangchang constituency in Paro, I saw the PDP candidate Mr. Ugyen Tshering brandishing a paper - supposedly a copy of the Times of India article titled “Bhutan’s road to democracy leads to China?”. Mr. Ugyen Tshering made the point that, according to the article, Indo-Bhutan relations now stand imperiled.

I am aghast! Even if it were true, this is not something that a person should make a public proclamation about - particularly not by an aspiring Parliamentarian. The reason is simple: the enormity of problems associated with a fall-out in the relations between two neighbors with very special geopolitical realities - such as those of India and Bhutan - is simply mind-boggling. Every Bhutanese and, for that matter, every Indian should be worried - of such an eventuality.

I logged on to the Times of India website and read the article. I have never read an article more hollow and amateurish than the one that was now becoming the PDP candidates’ much-celebrated talking point on the Common Forums - from Paro to Kanglung to Zhemgang. I cannot understand why an article of such poor content and authorship is kicking up hysteria of such maniac proportions. Consider the following.

The author of the article is someone called Sachin Parashar. I called up a friend in the Indian media fraternity in New Delhi to find out who this person was. He hadn’t heard of the reporter. When I made mention about the article, the friend said that he was indeed aware of the article and had infact discussed about it with one or two members of the Indian “Think Tank”. In his view, given that someone unknown and unschooled had authored the article, it was inconsequential. He said that although the said reporter had, at times, written on foreign affairs and foreign affairs related news, he had never before written an analytical piece on Bhutan - it was not his area of expertise. The only news articles he did on Bhutan were limited to two pieces he did in December of 2009. The friend said that although the language was good, he felt that given the poor arguments presented, the article is more likely to be a “plant” from Bhutan, rather than something the author wrote as a serious piece, of his own accord.

The friend mentioned that had such an article been authored by the likes of Salman Haider or Indrani Bagchi, there was need for concern. More importantly, he opined that the article is not an official view of the Government of India and thus, it should be ignored. In his understanding, the government of India is satisfied with the explanation offered by the Prime Minister of Bhutan - subsequent to his famous talk with the Chinese Premier.

Certainly, the news of Indo-Bhutan relations being strained should be a matter of great alarm for the Bhutanese people. However, in this case, given the standing of the reporter and the ludicrousness of arguments he presents to substantiate his views, there is no need for us to be unduly worried. It seems like mischief is intended and, unless one is a complete dullard, one can see that there is nothing substantive in the article - does not seem like this is something over which we should lose our sleep.

…………… To be Continued

Two Interesting Comments

Since I do not have the time to write an article this morning, I am going to post two comments made by two different readers on two of my most recent posts:

One wrote:
“Coming from you, this is a much needed fresh air, replete with wisdom :). This is by far your most "unbiased" article on the current election”.

The above comment was posted on my article titled “Is Proof Needed?”. As you can see, my article was critical of the DPT. The reader seems to appreciate this article and even goes as far as to say that it is “replete with wisdom”. He/she calls it “unbiased”. In other words, what the reader means is that any article that I write on my blog that is unfavorable to the DPT is a good article and is like a “much needed fresh air”. What this means is that anything I write good about DPT is biased and bad!

Another reader commented thus (on my post titled "A political Coupe Without Parallel!":
“What we really need are smart, dedicated, and honest politicians that will take our country far through a governance delivery mechanism that is truly fair and equitable”.

This is a reader after my own heart. Like him I too am for “smart, dedicated, and honest politicians”. We certainly need our politicians to posses these fine qualities. This is precisely the point I have been trying to make through my recent posts, which were prompted by a sense of disgust that I feel at the DNT leaders and founders deserting their own party to join an opposing party against whom they made a show of contesting - in the Primary round.

They were not “smart” to assume that the Bhutanese people were so dumb as to not see their game plan.

They were far from being “dedicated” when they deserted the party they formed and led. They were even less so when they abandoned the rest of the party members - to join another party in order that they can still remain in the race - while the rest of the brood was left in the lurch - without leadership or direction.

They were not “honest” when they mislead the whole nation into believing that they stood for a cause and ideology that is distinct from others. They were not being honest when they claimed that they were a party that is separate from all others. They were not being honest when they said that they were stronger candidates than others whom they replaced - when they were not. Of the seven, six of them were beaten by candidates of other parties. In fact, three of them were royally trounced by the same candidates of the PDP whom they ousted - on the pretext that they were stronger.

Whole lot of people argue with me that it is OK for these seven from the DNT to gang up with the PDP - because they opine that it will make our democracy so much more stronger.

One question these detractors have yet to answer me, convincingly, is: If that were true, why didn’t these seven join the PDP before the Primary? Why after?

Think about it!

Is Proof Needed?

Even while the people of Bhutan are still reeling under the trauma of the discovery that some of their chosen candidates are nothing more than accomplices in a game of sham and deceit, we are told that concrete proof of the collusion between the DNT and the PDP has now been submitted to the ECB - in the form of a audio recording of one of the PDP candidates’ public admission of such a collusion.

To add to the drama, I am told that the DPT has now filed a case with the ECB - asking that action be taken against the said candidate and the party.

This is not good. What further proof do we need? Actions speak louder than words and the fact that the entire top leadership of the DNT, including some of their founding members, moved to the PDP is confirmation beyond a shred of doubt that there is collusion - either at the leadership level or at the party level. Either way, it is too late in the day to make an issue of it. We need to put all this behind us and move forward. The ECB is the regulatory authority and, whether they will do their job or not, whether their rules in place allow them to act in a certain manner or not, we need to concentrate on completing the elections. For, every day of delay costs the country dearly.

The DPT needs to rise above such pettiness and focus on its campaign. Get the message out - prove that it is the superior party that it claims to be. Remember that, time and again, the Bhutanese people have proven to be wise and smart. They know.

It would not be such a great victory for the DPT - should the ECB disqualify Norbu Wangchuk - based on their incessant heckling. Instead, the taste of victory would be so much sweeter - if the people were given the chance to show what they really think of such behavior from their politicians.

I am for quickly wrapping up this election and moving on with life. I am not interested in prolonging this - I write on the issue as a matter of historical record - so that future generations may read and understand how our democracy was shaped and who were the players who steered the course of our democracy - in a given direction.

Years from now, when people read of what nefarious plans have been hatched to fight and win elections, they will know that if the people of our generation have been lacking in ethics and morality, we certainly did not suffer from lack of craft and guile!

A Political Coup Without Parallel!

We can finally put to rest all the conspiracy theories. The game plan is out in the open. It is now proven beyond doubt that the Druk Nyamrup Tshogpa (DNT) and the People’s Democratic Party (PDP) did not collude after the Primaries - the alliance was struck even before the elections were announced; way before the first Parliament was dissolved and, way before the DNT came into being as a legitimate political entity.

Thus, unlike what the Druk Phuensum Tshogpa (DPT) and others say, my own view is that their convergence cannot be called collusive politics - not in the sense it is understood or inferred. For me, I see it as a regrouping of the co-conspirators; the implementation of a strategy conceived months before - the brazen and audacious finale to a political coup that is without parallel!

I am aghast at the brilliance and boldness of this scheme. I doubt if something similar has ever been pulled off anywhere else in the world - with such delicacy and flair. This must be the Bhutanese uniqueness that I keep hearing about.

However, the genius of the master schemers notwithstanding, there are certain aspects to this virtuoso that, somehow, come through as something that is not in the regular order of things. After all, even if this was treated as a game, the players are still governed by the rules of the game. We need to understand:

(a)    Was the means employed to achieve the end honorable, well

        intended and transparent to other members in their respective

        parties? Were all the candidates in these two parties aware that

        their leaders had struck a deal? Was the deal, and

        the subsequent transfer of the DNT member to the PDP,

        in the best interest of the country and the people of Bhutan?

(b)    What would have been the implication on the country and its

        governance - had DPT been defeated in the Primary

        round - as a result of the DNT/PDP combine? In other

        words, what would have been the implication, had the

        two parties (DNT & PDP) whose leaders had entered into

        a pre-arrangement - were to be elected to our

        Parliament - to form both the Government as well

        as the Opposition?

(c)    What would be the implication should DPT be defeated in

         the General round and the seven leaders who defected

         from the DNT and those from the PDP go on to form

         the nucleus of our government for the next five years?

(d)    What was the reason behind creating two separate entities -

         when it has already been pre-agreed that they would

         ultimately represent only one party - either the PDP if the

         DNT lost or the DNT - if the PDP lost?  What are the

         implications of such an arrangement - on the state and

         other political parties contesting the elections? And, last but

         not least;

(e)    What is the possibility of an “Acho” factor behind one

         or some of our political parties?

NOTE: One of my inventive friends explained to me that “Acho” is the equivalent of “Sugar Daddy” in the Western concept.

Get Your Facts Right

In all of my posts so far relating to the ongoing elections, I have never given the slightest of indication that I prefer the DPT, over other parties. I have tried to do a fair analysis of things based on facts. However, some have accused me of being a “mouthpiece” of the DPT. I am not one and I am not fool enough to sound like one. But I am a Bhutanese and I am, over and above everything else, concerned about the outcome of the elections that is currently underway.

What I am trying to do is to try and understand what exactly is afoot. I am incensed that the entire top leadership of a party can actually go and abandon a party they have formed; in whose name they have received funds from the state and, based on the faith and trust they placed on these leaders, forty other candidates have joined the party to contest the elections, and lost.

I am reminded, time and again, that the reason why these seven have deserted their own party and joined an opposing party, against whom they have contested the elections in the Primary rounds, is because these seven candidates are “strong” candidates and that they are good for Bhutanese democracy.

Figures tell a different story. Except for Dorji Choden, all the other six candidates have not won in their constituencies. On the contrary, the results show that their voters have rejected them. Thus, how can anyone say that these are “STRONG” candidates?

Additionally, look at the following Comparison Chart. It shows that the PDP candidates whom they have replaced - on the pretext that they are stronger candidates - have actually beaten some of these very DNT candidates.

Kinley Dorji, DNT’s candidate from Radi-Sakteng was actually beaten by the PDP candidate whom he replaces - both in the EVM as well as in the Postal Ballots. Same is the case with DNT’s Panbang candidate - the PDP candidate who he replaces actually beat him in both the EVM as well as the Postal Ballots.

It is no different in the case of the Jumotshangkha-Martshala constituency - the DNT candidate who replaces the PDP candidate got royally trounced by the PDP candidate who has now been unceremoniously shunted out.

The PDP candidate who has been replaced by the DNT candidate from Kanglung-Samkhar-Udzorong actually won in the EVM vote count. Also, in the Bardo-Trong constituency, the PDP candidate who got replaced by the DNT candidate got superior results in the Postal Ballots.

So, what is the reason why some people are trying to misinform the Bhutanese people with falsehood?

Unlike Dorji Choden who had no qualms about declaring on national TV that our Ex-Prime Minister and two Ex-Ministers are liars - I would like to put the facts on the table and let the Bhutanese people decide - who the real liars are and who the stronger candidates are.

If hard facts tell a different story, if the DNT candidates who replaces those in the PDP are not stronger as claimed, then what is the real reason behind why weaker candidates are replacing winning candidates?

Desertion: What Can The ECB Do?

It is now official - seven of the DNT candidates have moved to PDP. And, as rumoured, these seven consist of the President, the Vice President and two founding members of the party. One interesting fact is that, of the seven, three of them (Dorji Choden, Lekey Dorji and Pelzang Wangchuk) contested as PDP candidates during the 2008 elections. With their return to the PDP this time round, these three have come full circle.

We may never be completely sure of the far-reaching consequences of this unprecedented political maneuvering. The two parties - PDP and the DNT - has taken advantage of a loophole in the country’s electoral laws to forge an alliance that is in direct conflict with the Constitutional provisions.

Stray incidences of candidates moving from one party to another are a political reality. But the President, the Vice President and two founding members deserting their own party to strengthen and render muscle to another party is something that defies conventional logic. In my view, what these seven did transcends morality and ethics - there is something more than meets the eye. This cannot be simply a matter of political opportunism - there has to be something sinister for the entire party leadership to move to another party.

In the coming days we will discuss the probable reasons why such a thing has come to pass. But first things first.

The Druk Nyamrup Tshogpa is a state funded political party. Thus, it is a quasi-public institution and a state apparatus. The day it accepted state funding, it ceased to be an association of private individuals free to do as they please. That is the reason why the ECB is able to dictate its terms on the way political parties function in this country - because they use taxpayers’ money. And, because they use state funds, the political parties and the leadership of these parties are not free to do as they please - there is an element of accountability that is inherent in the principals of state funding of political parties.

Our existing laws cannot prevent the movement of party members and functionaries from one party to another. However, in particular, the founders and the top party leadership has a responsibility to the state. The reason why the party was accepted and registered as a political party fit to contest in the elections was based solely on the composition of the founders, leaders and candidates it is comprised of. Therefore, if the leadership of a party moves to another party en masse, the abandoned party (DNT) is like a rudderless ship without a Captain or a Vice Captain to steer it safely to port.

This is a situation that cannot be acceptable to the state. The state, through the ECB, has invested lot of money behind the party - upwards of ten million. The ECB cannot look at it as a bad investment gone sour and look on helplessly and do nothing about it.

If nothing, the ECB must, at the minimum, require the party leaders and founders to reorganize the party structure and management - before they are allowed to register with another party. Failing that, these leaders and founders must be asked to refund the money the state spent behind the party and de-register it as a political party worthy of receiving state funding.

A Final Request to Druk Nyamrup Tshogpa

The two parties - DPT and the PDP - have only one day in which to finalize their list of candidates who will represent their respective parties in the General Round of 2013 elections. And, by the morning of the 14th July, 2013, the nation will know which of the two parties will form the government and which will be in the Opposition.

On the 13th of July, 2013, the people of Bhutan will deliver their collective verdict - as to which party should form the next government. Thereafter, the decision will be irreversible. All of us have to accept the collective wisdom of the people - no amount of lamenting will alter anything. Nonetheless, until that moment, each of us cannot help but hope that the party each of us support would win the elections and go on to form the next government. Towards that end, each of us will do what we must, to ensure that victory is on our side. And, none of us would be wrong to do what we must - to put the party we think is best for the country - to power. Because, most of us are driven by the power of our own convictions - why a certain party is better than the other.

Unlike some who accuse me of being a DPT mouthpiece, I do not accuse others of being a PDP mouthpiece. The PDP supporter has as much right and freedom to his/her convictions as I do to mine - and I am not going to say that theirs is wrong. For the record, I am not a DPT mouthpiece and I do not really care if I am accused of being one - for, I know that they are being irresponsible in saying so. If anything, I am a mouthpiece of the country and the King. I will shamelessly support the party that I believe is best for these two.

I know that all the parties and most of their candidates have the very best intention for the country - but I am not convinced that all the parties and all of their candidates have the capability and experience to best protect the interest of the country and the King. Good intentions are not enough - it has to be backed with competence and capability.

As the day is closing in on the two parties to finalize their candidate list, I am hearing some strange and demoralizing rumours. There is talk that the President, the Vice President and some of the founding members of the DNT are migrating to the PDP. I hope that this is not true. However, if it is true, then it is a political scandal without precedence - anywhere else in the world!

The DNT candidates have a duty to the nation. They have to bear in mind that as pioneers in the democratic process - how they behave at this formative stage will determine the course of Bhutan's democratic culture.

No amount of explaining can justify how there is merit in the President, the Vice President and the founding members of a party deserting the very party they formed. What of their responsibility to their other members who placed their faith and trust in them? What of the party itself? What of the Constitutional intent that discourages collusive politics?

As I have reminded some of the DNT members, its leaders should understand that 2013 is not the end of the world. Their time will come and therefore, they should have the patience and the resilience to bid for their time. Everything is pre-destined and nothing will happen before time. No one may preempt destiny.

If they go ahead with the move to PDP, there will be a hundred questions that will pop up. In the end, it will be their undoing. People will not forget their vile and despicable behavior. If they go ahead with the move, they have to be prepared for the backlash that is imminent. They have to answer questions that, as of now, remain unasked.

I hope and pray that common sense will prevail upon the DNT leadership.

Law On Withdrawal of Candidates

How often does it happen that the victor falls and the fallen triumphs? Not very often I am sure and, even if it does, it provably happens only in Bhutan.

The Bhutanese media - print and visual, including the social media - are full of reports about the supposed ongoing tug-of-war between the DPT and the PDP in their respective efforts to rope in some select members of the fallen party - the DNT - to replace some of their existing candidates.

In my view, the issue concerning the replacement of candidates, while permitted under the Election laws, has implications that go far beyond the moral and the ethical - it impinges on the very intent behind our Constitutional provision that dictates the form of our parliamentary democracy. This subject is too complex and thus requires a separate discussion. For now, I want to talk of something that has been completely ignored by the Bhutanese people and the media. It is an issue that, I believe, must be addressed first - before contemplating replacement of candidates.

What is to become of the candidates who are being replaced?

I do not see any discussion on this issue. In fact, scant regard is given to what they might have to say on the matter. The parties have to be reminded that these are the valiant soldiers who fought the war and won the battle for them.

Some of these candidates have given up jobs; some have forfeited opportunities and most have depleted their life’s savings - for the cause of a dream and the promise of a better future. These candidates have crossed high mountains and walked through deep valleys and gushing rivers - to canvass and campaign for their parties. They have worked hard to put the parties where they are today - at the very threshold of victory and honour.

Nothing can be more agonizing than to find that they have been victorious and yet, they are being denied their just reward. If these candidates are to suffer the humiliation and indignity of being ignominiously sidelined - to make way for candidates from other parties who have played no role in the party’s success, the parties better have damn good reasons to justify their immoral behavior. Or, they have to compensate the candidates whom they chose to cast away - in preference to others.

Surely the parties are aware that there is no authority under the sun that can force any candidate to accept replacement or withdrawal from the party. The following rule in the Election Act of the Kingdom of Bhutan, 2008 is clear on the issue:

Withdrawal of Candidature

229.    No political party shall be empowered to withdraw the

           nomination of its candidate once duly nominated, except

           with the written consent of the concerned candidate.

This means that the only way to make a candidate accept his/her withdrawal for replacement with another one is - if the party makes it worth his/her while! 

It will be illegal to force a candidate to withdraw against his/her wishes! And, it should be illegal for parties to clandestinely get their candidates to sign the withdrawal papers - without making known their rights under this rule.

How to decide what the amount of compensation should be? Not a problem - a benchmark has already been set: Nu.6.3 million. If you remember, a certain Dr. Lotey Tshering paid that sum to enter politics. There is no reason why it should be any lower - to get out of it.

Rumours, Rumours, Rumours II

I had said in my earlier post that the number of DNT candidates who are likely to move to PDP would be about NINE. But after reassessing certain ground realities, I wanted to downsize the number to about SEVEN. But yesterday evening I was told that the number of DNT candidates who may be moving to PDP might be as high as FOURTEEN! That would be preposterous. I do not believe that.

Even the DPT that is perceived to be a party that supposedly set store by superior moral and ethical standards seems to be wavering in uncertainty. There have been media reports - alleging that the party (DPT) has approached Tenzin Lekhpell and Norbu Wangchuk of the DNT to join the party. Mrs. Dorji Choden has also been categorical that she too received repeated offers from some parties. There is also a strong rumour that a candidate of a fallen party may replace DPT's Phuentsholing candidate.

As of this writing, the DPT high Command has not issued a denial of the media reports. So, is the DPT in the game too? - of switching candidates? I did not think so. And yet, someone yesterday evening told me, over a cup of tea that in politics, everything is fair game.

Really? Isn’t politics possible - even with just a bit of morality and ethics and decency?

Very few seem to have an understanding of the darker side of shuffling candidates at will. Politicians seem to ignore the fact that they are not engaged in a game of Chess. There are a whole host of issues involved.

Some people tell me that switching candidates is good - that it will strengthen parliamentary representation. But what of the path that gets strewn with human carcasses on their journey towards the august hall of the great Parliament? What of the weakened morality and human values?

There are those of you who remind us that there is a need to give others a chance. Please remember that not even God can give anyone a chance - unless his or her day has arrived.

Rumours, Rumours, Rumours

Mildly whacky to outright bizarre rumours are doing the rounds - the most incredible being that Dorji Choden, President of the fallen Druk Nyamrup Tshogpa is joining PDP. Although I had said that DNT is a party created by the PDP in an effort to beat the DPT, and yet, somehow the thought that a President of a Party can actually desert her own party to join another one seems totally incredible. In fact it is scandalous! We will wait and see. 

But no less laughable is the rumour being deliberately floated by one DNT candidate that the DPT leadership has approached him to join the party. It is quite absurd that a victorious party should actually approach a losing candidate to join the party - particularly when their own candidate in that constituency has trounced every other contender. However, I think I can understand the reason why putting out such a rumour can help them.

The DPT leadership must be aware that their reputation and image has taken a beating - as a result of eleven substitutions they made. Rumblings are rife in the market place that the party has not acted as one with Tha-Damsi. For the DPT to contemplate any change in their candidates at this stage would be suicidal. They will be playing right into the hands of the Opposition.

Rumour also has it that Jigme Zangpo has joined PDP.

The most credible rumour: that H E Lyonpo Sangay Ngedup is rejoining the party. If that is true - the challenge to DPT will be raised to a completely different level.

One another rumour that is doing the rounds is that Dr. Lotey Tshering is finally throwing in his towel and headed for Bangladesh where he has been offered employment at an astronomical remuneration. In my view, quite bogus! Damn - this Dr. Lotay issue is fascinating! This one deserves comprehensive and in-depth analysis.

Want to Bet? II

Who wants to bet with me that Druk Nyamrup Tshogpa (DNT) was never intended as a political party but as PDP’s contrivance in its war of attrition against the DPT? Would you give credence to my gut feeling that its defeat in the Primary round was by design - rather than as a result of lack of support from the voters.

Almost all the people I had spoken to and discussed with - prior to voting - agreed that the DNT had much better candidates and that the race would be between them and the DPT. I too believed that to be true.

On 28th evening, I was told by one of my nephews in Geylegphug that his friend who is a candidate-designate for one of the parties told him that it didn’t really mater who won - PDP or DNT - he told him smugly that it was the same thing.

What conclusions can be drawn from such a curious statement? Additionally, what is the idea of a lackluster party Manifesto the DNT put out? Think for yourself.

If what I think is right, the game plan will begin to unravel itself in the coming weeks. Watch closely the lateral movement of candidates from one party to another. In particular lock your oculi on the following nine candidates (some of whom are founding members of the party) of the DNT:

          Achyut Bhandari
          Dorji Choden
          Dr. Lotay Tshering
          Dr. Tandin Dorji
          Jigme Zangpo
          Lekey Dorji
          Norbu Wangchuk
          Sangay Zam
          Tenzin Lekhpell

In particular, the case of Dr. Lotay Tshering is most intriguing - a more in-depth analysis is required on this one.

Want to Bet?

I just returned to Thimphu after having performed my duty to myself, my country and to the future generations of Bhutanese - I cast my vote. I am relieved that the Primary round is finally over.

I should rejoice but the result is so unexpected that I am overwhelmed with a sense of foreboding. Something is not quite right - and my mind has been whirring in all directions like a top gone out of control.

I have drawn a few conclusions - all of them pretty outlandish and rather bizarre and yet, very plausible. But to put them all in words will take a while. So, for the moment, since I see that currently there are 59 readers logged on to my Blog, I want to leave you with a teaser:

Who wants to bet with me that atleast nine (9) PDP candidates who participated in the Primary round will find themselves out in the cold - and that a large number of them will be replaced by candidates of the supposedly "fallen" Druk Nyamrup Tshogpa?

Welcome to the world of dirty politics!