Tuesday, May 28, 2019

Bhutan’s Bad Bet: How hydropower became a ruinous investment for Bhutan

Bhutan—a small, independent Buddhist kingdom the size of Switzerland—is located in the eastern Himalayas. Boxed in from the north by China and on all other sides by India, it is endowed with natural and environmental riches that few other countries in the world can match. The country boasts close to 750 bird species, some 500 orchid species, and upwards of 5,600 species of vascular plants, 200 species of mammals, and 800 butterfly species.

Bhutan’s altitudinal range is phenomenal, rising from 97 meters in the south to the highest point of 7,570 meters at the tip of Mt. Gangkhar Puensum, the world’s highest unclimbed peak. This extraordinary topographical scope has created climate multiplicity so vast that Bhutan is listed among the ten global biodiversity hotspots of the world. Its ecosystem diversity is unmatched in all of Asia.

Blessed with extraordinary natural wealth, the Bhutanese were traditionally an agrarian society, engaged wholly in agriculture farming, horticulture, and animal husbandry. The country was food self-sufficient, with the import of food items virtually unheard-of a few decades back. Sadly, with the advent of modernity beginning early 1960’s, that self-reliance has diminished because of a gradual but steady move away from farming and agriculture production to non-traditional economic activities. Accelerated economic and developmental activities saw the proliferation of imported labor to drive developmental activities such as road-building and the creation of infrastructure. As a result, Bhutan has needed to import a wide variety of foods from outside to feed its burgeoning population. Today, the country is firmly set on the road to modernization, at a speed that many citizens believe may be too fast-paced for our own good.

The journey toward hydro-electricity 
As these structural changes were taking place in Bhutan, neighboring India decided to hasten its pace of industrial production. As a result, India’s demand for electric energy shot up. 

Responding to India’s new hunger for energy, Bhutan declared itself a potential source for hydro-electricity, with an estimated potential generation of 30,000 megawatts. Geography alone seemed to be in its favor. Located in the Third Pole region—the Hindu Kush-Himalayan area that stores more snow and ice than anywhere else in the world outside of the north and south poles—Bhutan has a number of river basins that could be tapped for hydro-electricity generation. Thus Bhutan began to take baby steps towards hydro-electricity generation, both as a means of earning revenue to finance its many critical developmental goals and spurred by India’s newfound demand for electricity.

Bhutan’s energy-generating journey began in 1974, with the country’s first hydropower project: the Chhukha Hydropower Project. Subsequent hydropower projects—Kurichhu in 1995, Basochhu in 1996, and Tala in 1999—were all launched before the advent of democracy. Their construction was evenly paced, with each new project completed before the next commenced. All these early facilities were built with care, sound planning, and thoughtful implementation. The size of the projects was kept at manageable levels. In the end, each of these early projects benefited the country as a whole, with minimal or no environmental impact to the ecosystem.

A love story gone wrong
With the arrival of democracy in Bhutan in 2008, however, everything went haywire. Lawmakers felt an unprecedented urgency to accelerate hydropower project development. Groundbreaking for Punasangchhu-I in 2008 was quickly followed by Dagachhu in 2009, Punasangchhu-II in 2010, Mangdechhu in 2012, and Kholongchhu in 2015.

Today, other than the Dagachhu Hydropower Project, all of these massive structures remain incomplete. And all have become financial traps, churning out debt by the hundred of billions of ngultrums (the Bhutanese currency pegged to the Indian rupee).

Put simply, the story of hydropower generation in Bhutan has been a story of economic bondage, environmental destruction, and human displacement. Hydropower promoters have stuck with their story that these facilities are “run-of-the-river” projects (in which little or no water storage is involved), with minimal or no human displacement. Yet after two decades, some displaced families in the project areas have yet to receive substitute land for their property lost to the projects. Dam construction in unstable topography has triggered entire mountainsides to slide into nearby valleys, causing environmental denudation never seen before. Irreparable damage has struck the habitats of some of the world’s most endangered bird and wildlife species. And incessant and uncontrolled use of powerful explosives, such as dynamite to blast away rock formations, has destabilized the already-fragile geological formation of the young Himalayan range where these hydropower projects are located.

Among the hydropower projects dubiously claimed to be run-of-the-river projects—PHPA-I and PHPA-II—diversion dams reaching 86 meters and 130 meters respectively will be built. The water bodies that these giant dams will create could alter weather patterns and trigger earthquakes in an area where the land is already destabilized through blasting. Indeed, the whole of Gaselo village, in the Wangduephodrang district of western Bhutan, could end up in the belly of the Punatsangchhu.

Failed stewardship 
Bhutan’s two largest hydropower projects—PHPA-I and PHPA-II—have also seen what project authorities cynically call “geographical surprises”. In one incident at the PHPA-II, the roof of the main access tunnel caved in, killing an unspecified number of people. Both PHPA-I and PHPA-II projects have seen their cofferdams being flooded repeatedly year after year, causing costly delays in dam construction. It is frightening to realize that if project authorities have not even been able to assure fullproof design of simple and temporary cofferdams, what major design failures will emerge in the future?

Last year, Tala Hydroelectric Project’s inlet valve burst, killing two people on the spot and injuring two others. More recently, a flaw was detected at the Mangdechhu Hydro Power Project—a leak in one of the facility’s tunnel gates—causing a delay in the project’s scheduled May 2019 commissioning. The new date of commissioning has now been pushed to July, 2019. 

Meanwhile, the right side of the hill where the PHPA-I dam is being built has seen a number of slides. The result has been not only costly delays but charges that the site is unsuitable for dam construction. Originally planned for completion in 2016, PHPA-I is now scheduled to go into operation in 2024—a far-away target that is still a pipe dream. The truth is that the project will almost certainly never go online.

Unbridled costs and incompetent management
From an initial cost estimate of Nu.35.14 billion, the PHPA-I project by 2016 devoured Nu.93.75 billion. According to a conservative estimate, the last three years have pushed the cost past Nu.110.00 billion. At this rate, the total cost of construction will most likely cross the Nu.200.00 billion mark by the time the project is done—should that miracle come to pass. 

Incompetent project consultants have selected inappropriate project sites. To the horror of many engineers and residents, it became clear too late that Bhutan’s biggest hydropower projects, PHPA-I and II, are located in a seismically active zone. Had a proper pre-feasibility study been conducted by technically qualified professionals, the projects would have never been located in these vulnerable areas.

PHPA-I and II have also seen cost overruns in the region of 400% of their initial estimates. At 70% ownership, Bhutan is the majority shareholder of the projects—yet the Bhutanese have no say in the management of the projects, whether administrative or financial. Even simple decisions such as the choice of cement and aggregate used in the project’s construction fall outside the authority of the Bhutanese managers. The Indian project managers make all the decisions.

No benefits to local communities 
The Bhutanese government and project authorities have claimed for decades that hydropower projects will greatly benefit local communities. They continue to make this claim. But there is not one iota of proof on the ground. Bongo Gewog sits bang in the middle of two of Bhutan’s earliest and largest hydropower projects to date: Chhukha and Tala. As the National Statistics Bureau has revealed, the country’s poorest villages are located in the shadows of these massive projects. Indeed, road access to these villages is so poor that they are often completely cut off during monsoons.

It is not only the Bongo community that has yet to see tangible benefits. The same is true in every other community where a hydropower project has been launched. Worse, serious social ills have sprung up in the communities close to the project sites.

Debt traps and divine intervention
Most alarmingly, perhaps, the Bhutanese nation as a whole has not benefited, as the World Bank’s Economic Policy and Debt Department made clear:

Bhutan’s hydro-power projects have largely been perceived risk-free, and thus rapid hydro-power investment through heavy borrowing has not caused much concern until recently. Yet available information suggests that the sector’s financial performance has been deteriorating since 2007. The net profit (before tax) per unit of electricity sold has fallen sharply since 2007, driven by rising costs and declining revenue. The sector’s regular contribution to the budget has also declined for the past 10 years, from 6-8 percent of GDP during the early 2000s to 2.7 percent in 2011/12, notwithstanding the significantly increased electricity generation capacity. All this indicates that the sector’s “high commercial profitability” cannot be taken for granted. Should the hydropower sector’s financial performance continue to deteriorate, Bhutan’s solvency could be threatened. Although debt service costs are being borne by DGPC at present, after all, the hydropower debt is the government’s liabilities. The source of the performance deterioration has to be identified, and, remedial actions taken soon to avoid debt service difficulties.

A 2015 report titled “The New Debt Trap”—released by the Jubilee Debt Campaign, a UK-based company—listed Bhutan among 14 nations that are fast heading toward a government debt crisis.

Is India a boundless market?
As of 30th April, 2019, India has a total installed capacity of 356.100 gigawatts of electricity, generated from a variety of energy sources. This makes India the third-largest producer of electricity in the world.

State Power Minister Sobhandeb Chattopadhyay, of the West Bengal state of India, had declared as far back as 2016 that his state was set to export 1,000 megawatts of electricity to Bhutan and Nepal. The fact is, India achieved electricity surplus more than half a decade ago. Their problem is not energy generation, but poor transmission and distribution to the point of consumption in a manner that is efficient and cost-effective.

The “game-changer” myth 
In some sections of the Bhutanese society, people believe that India is dependent on Bhutan—that our small, proud nation is critical for India’s electricity needs. This is a terrifying misconception. Anyone can see that Bhutan’s mad rush for hydro-electricity generation may cause our nation long-term and terminal injury—not only to its economic health, but to its very sovereignty. The mindless rush toward hydropower generation in every one of the country’s pristine rivers runs the risk of shackling all of our river systems to eternal bondage.

In 2016, India Power Minister Piyush Goyal reported in the Upper House of the Indian Parliament that India imported 5.24 billion units of electricity from Bhutan during fiscal year 2015. Translated as a percentage of India’s total power generation in that year, Bhutan’s export of 5.24 billion units of electricity worked out to a mere 0.47% of that country’s total output. In terms of its energy relationship to India, Bhutan must wake up to its own utter triviality.

Hydro-electricity: Bhutan’s failed investment
India, which is landlocked Bhutan’s only market for hydro-electricity, has moved on to achieve an impressive energy surplus. Moreover, India can generate electricity from solar and coal at 4.6 cents per unit—far below Bhutan’s cost of generating hydroelectricity: 6 cents per unit. Given this scenario, it is suicidal for Bhutan to continue to chase its elusive hydropower dream. 

Compounding the problem, the cost of capital is punishingly high for Bhutan. We have borrowed money to build these hydropower projects at a preposterous interest rate of 10% per annum. Meanwhile, for the last three years, India’s hydropower generation amounted to less than 10% of their total electricity generation. The reason: they now consider hydropower generation unviable, compared with other power sources. Recently, thethirdpole.net ran an article titled “Who will buy Nepal’s hydropower?” That question is even more relevant to Bhutan.

Finally, global warming brought on by climate change will directly affect Bhutan’s hydropower potential. The rate of snow and ice melt in the Himalayan region is greater than in other parts of the globe. With a receding snowline and loss of ice in our mountain peaks, Bhutan’s hydropower potential may be far less than the stated 30,000 megawatts.

In the end, Bhutan must face the fact that its vaunted hydropower industry makes no sense: economically or ecologically.

A glimmer of hope?
Will our country face up to the truth or foolishly try to save face? So desperate are the principals in the PHPA-I endeavor that on February 28, 2019, they resorted to conducting a rimdro—a religious ceremony—for divine intervention. Their hope was that this unorthodox measure would appease the angry gods and local deities and help them progress with the project’s construction. They forget that such gods and deities are figments of the ingenuity and inventiveness of the human mind. Before the gods can come to their rescue, the hydropower authorities need to reorient their professionally-trained minds.

Fortunately, Bhutan’s moment of awakening may be at hand. Late last year, the Hydropower Committee recommended an encouraging shift in thinking, suggesting that Bhutan go slow and smart on new hydropower projects. The committee recommended that Bhutan complete all projects now in the pipeline before starting new ones. Additionally, it recommended that atleast two of our river basins—the Chamkharchhu and Amochhu basins—remain free of hydropower projects.

As a passionate blogger, environmentalist, and a citizen who dearly loves his country, I had called for the closure of the PHPA-I as far back as February of 2016. Regardless, the project still stands. However, recent developments indicate that the project’s managers are becoming increasingly frustrated by their inability to complete their mission. The realization is dawning on them that their technological, scientific, and engineering inventiveness is poor match against the forces of nature.

Is Bhutan finally waking up to the rude reality that tying our future to hydropower is to invite doom? Is Bhutan’s ill-starred romance with hydropower finally over? For the good of the Bhutanese nation and the Bhutanese people, I dearly hope so.


  1. Seems true many bhutenese should be informed about issue like this ,government should be more concerned and should be taking quick measures.

  2. well written la. The only consolation. India maybe India surplus, but quite a lot of it is probably from Coal. So hydro from Bhutan may, only may be a preferred choice for future.

  3. Excellent article ....a must read !

    “We have borrowed money to build these hydropower projects at a preposterous interest rate of 10% per annum.”(Source:Excerpt )

    My views:
    In 2012, I had proposed to higher authorities the possibility of exploring alternative sources of funds from regional and international capital market.. Bhutan could have issued hydropower bonds or maybe adopt the “Laos -Thailand” hydropower funding arrangement which would could have helped on the interest cost. Sadly nothing materialized.

    I think besides the “economic bondage, environmental destruction and human displacement” that Hydropower projects are synonymous with ... it’s also a classic example of jobless growth and this needs to be seen within the unemployment scenario in Bhutan, especially the youth.

    My two cents!

  4. Beyond what is said and written, ket us keep hope and continue the good work. True India can be self reliant in electric power, more so with the promise of Australia for Uranium to the PM Modi-ji.
    However, keeping our friendship alive India will still support us. If we can not pay ask our big brothers to lower the interest rate or increase the grants. Let us refer to an old Darjeeling treaty...

  5. I certainly agree with you. India is manupulating us and our politicians who are stagnant as a dam don't understand the seriousness of the situation that Bhutan will face in the future

  6. Great article. Although I would like to mention that India’s power sources are not always sustainable and could increase demand in future again.

  7. And finally repay by selling the country itself.

  8. Absolute Truth VS relative truth, the choice is ours!!, and our choice!!

    it is one sided story_ the story never attempted to catch benefits of hydro power project. Just because of negative impact to environment and Eco-system, we cannot afford to stop hydro power project. Moreover, the impact to environment can be reduced through constant monitoring and interventions.
    1. Rising of energy demand_ increased in number of industries, population, living standards, public facilities, etc.
    2. The hydro power is the most abundance and currently the cheapest form of energy in the country, and it is far better option than investing in tourism , agriculture, etc.( energy is the pre-requisite from development of tourism,agri, indus and any other sectors)
    3. Hydro-power is the brand of country economy as it contributes more than 45% of the total shares. ...

    ,,,,,,,,,etc. Lets not only preserve our environmental, but also manage it" because preserving necessary doesn't benefit in all cases.

  9. For your kind information, the coffer dam of PHPA-I has never flooded even once since the inception of the project. The author has prorated only the negative aspect of the Hydro-Project and he has not done the research properly. What about the benefits provided by it. Project effected families were not only given the substitute land they were also provided with job as per their qualification and 10000 units of free power supply for lifetime of the project. If there is anyone who is not compensated then there could be some reason behind that. Moreover it’s not the project that compensates land to the effected people; it is the government of Bhutan. It is very sad that people even believe such one-sided story without doing any research/ verifying it. Please do not spread such negative things about Hydro Project. We need hydro project as much as oxygen, for a tiny landlocked country with limited natural resources. Hydro power contributes 45% to the coffer of Govt., to realize it just deduct 45% from your salary and see how much you get, that will be the actual salary without contribution from HP.

  10. Interesting read!

  11. Just wish to say your article is as astonishing.
    The clarity for your publish is simply spectacular and that i can assume you are
    knowledgeable in this subject. Fine along with your permission allow me to seize
    your feed to keep up to date with imminent post. Thank you 1,000,
    000 and please continue the rewarding work.

  12. Thanks for your marvelous posting! I actually enjoyed reading it, you happen to
    be a great author. I will ensure that I bookmark your blog and
    will often come back someday. I want to encourage you continue your great writing,
    have a nice weekend!

  13. You could definitely see your expertise in the article you write.
    The arena hopes for more passionate writers like you who aren't afraid to say how they believe.
    At all times go after your heart.

  14. Ahaa, its fastidious discussion on the topic of this post here at this web site, I have read all that, so at this time me also commenting at this

  15. Wonderful items from you, man. I have take into accout your stuff previous
    to and you're simply too excellent. I actually
    like what you've bought here, really like what you're stating and the
    way through which you say it. You are making
    it entertaining and you continue to take care of to keep it smart.
    I can not wait to learn far more from you. That is really a tremendous web site.

  16. I know this if off topic but I'm looking into
    starting my own blog and was curious what all is required to get setup?
    I'm assuming having a blog like yours would cost a pretty penny?
    I'm not very web smart so I'm not 100% positive. Any tips or advice would be greatly appreciated.

  17. Hello, I log on to your blogs regularly.
    Your story-telling style is witty, keep up the good work!

  18. Hi there! This is my first visit to your blog!

    We are a team of volunteers and starting a new initiative in a community in the same
    niche. Your blog provided us useful information to work on. You have
    done a wonderful job!

  19. For most recent news you have to visit world-wide-web and on the
    web I found this website as a best website for latest updates.

  20. Hi, Neat post. There's an issue with your web site in internet explorer,
    may check this? IE still is the marketplace leader and a huge
    component to other people will miss your
    wonderful writing because of this problem.

  21. Hi Anon,

    Thanks for your visit and comment ...I will see how to correct this.

    Bye and take care

  22. Hi, I want to subscribe for this web site to obtain latest updates,
    so where can i do it please help out.

    1. Hi Anon,

      No idea ... I think best is that you keep revisiting :)-

  23. Some truly great posts on this site, regards for contribution.

  24. Hi there colleagues, how is all, and what you wish for to say
    on the topic of this article, in my view its truly remarkable for me.

  25. I absolutely love your site.. Pleasant colors & theme.
    Did you make this site yourself? Please reply back as I?m wanting to create my very own blog and would love to find out where you got this from or just what the theme is called.
    Many thanks!

  26. This is a good tip particularly to those new to the blogosphere.
    Brief but very accurate information… Thanks for sharing this one.
    A must read post!

  27. I'm impressed, I must say. Rarely do I encounter a blog
    that's equally educative and entertaining, and without a doubt,
    you've hit the nail on the head. The issue is an issue that too
    few men and women are speaking intelligently about. Now i'm very happy I found
    this during my search for something concerning this.

  28. You should take part in a contest for one of the best sites online.
    I am going to recommend this web site!

  29. I do not even know how I ended up here, but I thought this
    post was great. I don't know who you are but
    definitely you are going to a famous blogger if
    you are not already ;) Cheers!