Showing posts with label Media. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Media. Show all posts

Sunday, May 11, 2025

Bhutan’s Press Freedom: Why Speaking Out Is an Act of Patriotism

Some 16,000 kilometers and a dozen time zones away, in a distant land called the United States of America—a country considered first among First World nations and populated, we are constantly reminded, by highly educated and knowledgeable people—the electorate chose a proven nutcase as their President. At our ostensibly safe remove, we watch gawk-eyed at the ludicrousness of the American people’s choice.

Closer to home, we are rattled by the news that India launched Operation Sindoor against Pakistan, in retaliation for its role in the cowardly murder of 26 Indian and Nepalese tourists in Pahalgam, a town in the Indian state of Kashmir.

And now, as if we did not have enough to worry about, comes the shameful revelation that our beloved country’s press freedom ranking has plummeted a stupendous 119 places—in just four years!

This is simply incredible. Article 7 of our Constitution explicitly grants us “freedom of speech, opinion and expression”, including the “right to information”. With all that going for us, what the hell are we doing scrapping the bottom of the ladder? My hunch is that it has to do with the League of the Three Monkeys.

The First Monkey and leader of the pack:
The footloose Dasho who thinks he has the power to supercede the Constitution and decide that he can interpret press freedom in a way that makes it convenient for him to cover up his own failings.

The Second Monkey:
The foot soldier and the custodian of the Fourth Estate who is so feeble that he allows himself to be trampled all over by the First Monkey—effectively surrendering editorial independence to rank outsiders with vested interest.

The Third Monkey:
The self-righteous Bhutanese who prefers to stay muted, under the mistaken belief that self-censorship is an act of patriotism and loyalty, and that remaining hushed is a sign of maturity and wisdom.

It is sad. We have so much potential, nature has been so bountiful to us, and our leadership toils tirelessly and with unflinching hope and faith. Yet we squander our good fortune through cowardice and aloofness, because being truthful is mistaken for being courageous. In today’s Bhutan, frankness—being forthright and speaking boldly—is considered dangerous. 

I have been told repeatedly by readers that I am “brave” to write the things I do—a sentiment with which I completely disagree. To bite one’s tongue when one’s country is facing monumental challenges is unconscionable. The result of our free-floating and often baseless anxiety is that Bhutanese citizens are too afraid to claim the right to express themselves freely.

I myself have experienced unjust treatment in the hands of those who took upon themselves the role of moral guardian. In 2012, BBS TV silenced me because I was speaking the truth, on camera:


Years later, during a media gathering, Kuensel management urged me to contribute to their paper once in a while. I agreed, although I pointed out to them that since they are the mouthpiece of the government, they may not be able to handle my unvarnished views. They dismissed my worry as rubbish, assuring me that they could handle whatever I write. Within days, I contributed an article and, true to their word, they carried the piece in the print edition of Kuensel, dated June 29, 2024:


Two days later, however, a reader overseas wrote to tell me that my article had been removed from Kuensel’s website.

To this day, Kuensel has not told me why the article that they saw fit to be published in hard copy was scrubbed from their website. Personally, I don’t care. But it is heartbreaking to realize that after 60 years in the business, our national newspaper is clueless about the central role it plays as upholder of the nation’s conscience. 

In my view, I do not believe that there is a need to feel petty indignation at our feeble press-freedom ranking. Instead, it’s time for serious introspection.

Monday, July 18, 2022

The Accidental Tourist

When Aum Rinzi Om of WHO Bhutan Office requested me to participate in their just concluded Social Media Training Workshop on Digital Literacy and Content Creation, I was reluctant at first - but eventually agreed to be a part of it.

Training session in progress: truly intense and extensive. The WHO Bhutan Office hopes to upskill the local media's reporting competence, particularly in the social media platform. Other than Bhutan Today, all the rest of the media houses were represented: BBSBusiness Bhutan, Centennial RadioGyalchi SarshogKuzoo FM, TheJournalist, Yiga Radio, TheBhutanese, including JAB, both digitally. Passang Tshering of Passu Diary and I represented the Blogging community.


Venue of the training workshop: Le Meridien Riverfront Paro

I did not realize I was being drawn into a world of complex technological whirlpool that is the social media, of which …… PHEW!!! … I adamantly refused to be a part.

The Annual Conference of the SEARO of the WHO for the year 2022 is scheduled to be held in Paro during September of 2022. The RC75 Conference is so impactful for Bhutan and the region that the WHO Bhutan Office conducted a 4-days training Workshop for Bhutan's media fraternity at the Le Meridien Paro Riverfront.

As the first day of the Workshop was followed by the second, and then the third, and finally the fourth, I was walked through a plethora of technological innovations and tools of the trade that were available to the influencers of the social media. The experience was dizzying - caused by my own cluelessness on the subject. The very competent presenter of the Workshop - Phub Dorji, a Social Media Manager at the Internet technology firm of Nyingnor - rattled off scores and scores of tricks and tips on how to remain on the sunny side of the mighty Facebook by doing nothing that would result in deflecting traffic away from them. He listed out sites, applications and tools that would do all the work for the social media users and managers - he demonstrated computer applications and programs that would help a user achieve amazing things - like make an obtrusive branch disappear from a picture, or morph a monkey into a mouse. One thing dawned on me - the burgeoning use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) has the very real danger of rendering the human breed into complete idiots!

The WHO’s Workshop in Paro made me realize why the present generation is not as hardworking and passionate as my generation. They do not need to be - all the hard work has already been put in by others on their behalf - all that they need is the likes of Phub Dorji to tell them where to get all the tools they need to do their stuff.

For a while I was saddened - there could very well come a day when the AI could take over the HI (Human Intelligence). But on deeper contemplation, I realized that the HI is the creator of the AI - meaning that the relationship between the HI and AI is that of a master and a slave. Thus, it is impossible that the slave can overwhelm the master. It was thus that when a participant asked me the question: Which is more important - the camera or the photographer - in creating beautiful images? I answered thus:

The photographer is still the master - the camera is the slave that does the bidding of the master. The photographer will tell the camera what shutter speed to select when the master chooses to engage a certain aperture setting. The Master will do the framing of the image, the master will decide the time of day to capture an image, the master will decide how shallow the DoF should be, the master will decide what angle to shoot from, the height from which to shoot. The camera will only meekly follow the master’s bidding - it is an inanimate object that has no capability to argue with the master, or to tell the photographer what to do.

Friday, January 21, 2022

My Life's Second QUOTA

This is the second time in my life that I am being served a “QUOTA”. The first time was in 1979 when I became eligible for a car quota. But I had no means to afford a car although a Toyota Corona sedan those days cost only Nu.68,000.00. Fortunately people those days had their ethics and morality intact – we did not sell our car quota in the black market, as is now the national culture.

This time round it is the venerable Kuensel that is awarding me a QUOTA. For the consideration of an annual subscription fee of Nu.2,000.00, the Kuensel has been generous to allow me access to the digital version of their daily newspaper. But I was clueless that the right of access came with a daily quota - five times a day. Anything in access of that and I get the boot! See the following:

First Log-in

Second Log-in

Third Log-in

Fourth Log-in

Fifth Log-In

Sixth and Final Log-in

As you can see from the above history of my attempts, the first time I logged in to read the paper was at 5.27AM. The paper was not uploaded.

My second try was at 5.43AM – the paper was still not uploaded.

My third attempt was at 5.58AM – sill no luck - the paper was still missing.

For the fourth time I logged in to see if the paper was uploaded – at precisely 6.22AM. I was happy to see that the paper was finally uploaded. PHEW!!!

Sadly, I had failed to notice that my right of access was diminishing regressively, every time I attempted to log in to read the paper.

Consequently, on my fifth attempt at 6.23AM, I was sternly notified that I had exhausted my day’s QUOTA.

I made a sixth attempt anyway - to re-read the Kuensel at 7.04AM, I was unceremoniously shown the door – the message was clear: YOU HAVE LOGGED IN MORE THAN FIVE TIMES TODAY. TRY TOMORROW!

So much for my troubles ….. and money!

Something that I realized is that if I had attempted to log in five times before the Kuensel decided to upload the day's paper, I would have been barred from reading the paper for the day.

When this LOCKDOWN is lifted, I want to visit the good Samaritans at the Kuensel and find out:

1.  The reason behind the limited access to the paper when I have paid in full the asking price.
2.  Why the world has to wait for Kuensel to break their slumber – they ought to know that there are people who start work early.

Monday, January 19, 2015

Unexpected Star of the Vibrant Gujarat Show

From all accounts, our Prime Minister had a successful trip to India. One paper calls him “unexpected star of the Vibrant Gujarat show”. A friend in Bengaluru, India sent me the following news clipping. I am told that Indian media is full of praise for our Prime Minister.




But the best praise for him came from a Bhutanese. She said; “I am not impressed so much by the fact that the PM impressed everybody in Gujarat. I am more impressed by the fact that he is turning out to be even better Prime Minister than the consummate Opposition Leader that he was”.

Frankly it is good for the country that our Prime Minister made a big impression on the people of India. I have only one regret: like PM Modi, our Prime Minister Tshering Tobgay should have addressed the Gujarat gathering in shudh Dzongkha :)-

Friday, March 21, 2014

KUENSEL - The Grand Old Dad Among Bhutanese Newspapers

One of the first things Dasho Kinley Dorji (currently the Secretary of the Ministry of Information & Communications) did, as soon as he took over the Kuensel as its CEO some two decades back, was to redesign the Kuensel’s masthead. The paper’s present masthead was conceived and adopted by him.


Before the masthead was adopted, I was among the few Dasho Kinley consulted as to the appropriateness of the masthead. In particular he was in serious doubt whether the sentence “THAT THE PEOPLE SHALL BE INFORMED” was grammatically correct. Of that one I wasn’t sure either - but of one thing I was sure and I told him so - that the background color of the masthead - blue - looked YUCKY! The color did not change and neither did my opinion about it, to this day. However Dasho Kinley went ahead and adopted the current masthead - yucky color and grammatically doubtful sentence et all. As far as Dasho Kinley was concerned, he made sure that he went through the motion of seeking popular opinion but as the top dog of the paper - he did exactly as he pleased - opinions be damned!

Since then, Kuensel never failed to INFORM the people. But the words
THAT THE PEOPLE SHALL BE INFORMED” did not bind them to MISINFORM the people from time to time. Infact, they did so with unfailing regularity.

Look at the following. The Prime Minister dedicates the project to the IVth Druk Gyalpo - but Kuensel says that it is to the Prime Minister.


The following news report in the Kuensel is encouraging. The civil servants are going to be given free plots of land - to grow vegetables. That is a great idea - it will boost vegetable production and one never knows -  this may be one job at which they might excel!


Best of luck to the new breed of farmers.

Tuesday, May 15, 2012

Too Much Unrestrained Freedom?

Recently, a large number of my friends and relatives around the country spotted me on BBS TV - bearing a microphone in hand and wildly gesticulating like a man possessed - making some speechless points!


A friend commented that I was so driven by emotion that I was dumbfounded for words. Another smart Alec opined that I was a masterful shadow-boxer. However, the best comment came from my dad who too had seen me, for a fleeting moment, wordlessly making some points on BBS TV. Apparently, he had called up my sister to ask if I was joining politics. A mute politician? Preposterous!

You might wonder why I am suddenly the center of so much attention among my friends and relatives and why such a huge ruckus is being kicked up about my mute appearance on the BBS TV. The reason is that I was invited by the Bhutan Center for Media and Democracy to be on the panel that was discussing: Freedom of Media. How is freedom of the media understood in Bhutan, how do we fare in terms of free speech? What about our regulatory environment?

I had made some very scathing remarks against the media as a whole, how they had so far failed to live up to their enormous responsibilities as the Fourth Estate. How most of our young reporters are forever stuck in that state of infanthood. How, even after so many years, they are not being able to mature into responsible, committed and passionate custodians of the nation’s conscience. How some of them have usurped their right to free speech by being irresponsible and damaging in their reporting.

I had also touched on the subject of the RTI Act being proposed as a knee-jerk reaction arising out of some hurt ego and whether we have evolved enough to fully understand the responsibilities that come with freedom and whether we are mature enough to understand and respect the enormity of the empowerment that the RTI Act can give us.

I had also reminded them that if they were not getting the information they seek from government agencies, it was because they antagonized the source of the information and that they lacked tact and skill in handling prospective sources of the information they seek.

I had categorically stated before my talk that being critical was not being negative. I am on record (the entire proceedings were being tape recorded and video filmed) where I had pleaded with the media to be more responsible and not to add bewilderment to the already confusing state of affairs as a result of our lack of experience in a brand new form of governance.

It is obvious from the way my words were censored and muted by BBS TV, that my opinions were not well received by the media. That is fine but that kind of behavior throws up a very serious question:

How can the media in Bhutan grow into a responsible public apparatus if they can silence and moderate opposing and uncomplimentary views about themselves? Who then regulates them? Is the current state of affairs among our media houses the result of too much unrestrained freedom?

Think about it.