The
gaggle of notable speakers from around the world had one common message: that Bhutan
is in absolute dire need of an RTI Act and, in their view, we need it TO-DAY,
not tomorrow.
Let
me assure you that the lineup of speakers at the seminar was impressive - each
of them were articulate, well spoken, fluent and very knowledgeable. I was
thoroughly impressed by the vastness of their experiences. I know too that they
were very sincere in their good intentions for Bhutan. They truly believed that
they had a very important message for us.
All
that is fine, except that there is one minor detail we must not forget: the
fact that all of them come from cultures that are vastly different from our own.
The maturity of our democracies is at two opposite ends of the pole. The
realities that exist in their countries are different from those that exist in
ours. And, MOST IMPORTANTLY, we do not share a common history; a history that
most often direct and shape our future.
They
come from countries that have long and painful history of colonization, of
deprivation, of subjugation, corrupt politicians and failed governments. That
is why, during the course of the debate, I asked them a simple question:
How
are their experiences relevant to us?
We
are a nation of less than 700,000 people. There are hardly any secrets in
Bhutan. In fact, because of our compactness, transparency is a national
embarrassment.
Our
Constitution already guarantees us our right to information. What additional
rights or freedom can an RTI Act offer us?
Persistently,
the panelists collectively insisted that the RTI Act is most often the result
of DEMAND FOR INFORMATION. I pointed out that if that were true, as far as
Bhutan was concerned, there is only one, repeat, only one recorded history of
demand for information - that of Hon’ble National Council Member, Mr. Sangay
Khandu. Can a law be considered for enactment based on one solitary demand?
Ofcourse, there were a few articles written by the media extolling the virtues
of the RTI Act. But the media’s demand for RTI Act is inconsequential since every
one of us know that their interest in it constitute a very serious conflict of
interest.
One other
question I asked the panelists at the seminar was this: why did a great country
like India with a few million brilliant minds take 56 years to enact their RTI
Act – from the time they got their Constitution? One of the Indian speakers put
the blame squarely on their politicians. That was very unfair. On the contrary,
my view was that the Indian people were very wise because of which they gave themselves that
many years to understand the issues involved, engage the public to debate on
it, deliberate on each of the clauses of the proposed Act, understand their
implications, so that, when finally they enact it, they have a well thought out
and enforceable law that would benefit the common people.
I am
not suggesting that Bhutan take 56 years to enact an RTI Act. But certainly, we
can allow ourselves few years to work on it, allow our democracy to mature, our
people to understand their responsibilities that come with the freedom that
they have been given under the democratic system.
I
also opined that it was simple to enact a law but very, very difficult to
enforce it. I suggested that Bhutan must first work towards creating the
enabling conditions in order that the delivery and application of the RTI
becomes possible. Given the poor state of our record keeping and the level of
ICT knowledge and implementation, enforcing the Act will be near impossible,
regardless of our lawmakers’ very best intentions.
I
pointed out to the resource persons that out of the 241 countries, only 86
countries enacted RTI Act, as of 2008. More than 60% of the countries did not
adopt the law. Why? By the way, one among those counties that does not yet have
an RTI Act in place is: Singapore. And we know that Singapore is one of the
world’s most dynamic countries.
As I
mentioned at the beginning, the experts believe that we need the law NOW. I
disagree with them totally. We are not ready for it now. Every educated
individual is in no doubt of the empowerment the RTI Act will give the common
man. However, its relevance and usefulness is a matter of timing. We need to
understand the mindset of the people who will be seeking the information and those
of the present set of people who are holding the information. Will the giver give willingly?
Will the seeker seek responsibly?
In
conclusion, it is my view that the experts’ need for haste is driven by their paranoia
and a dread of their own past. Bhutanese people have no such baggage.
No comments:
Post a Comment