There
has not been a single day when I have not thought of the enormity of the loss
of Wangdue Phodrang Dzong. It is a national loss, and not the loss of the
people of Wangdue alone. Bhutan is poorer by one Dzong and, despite all our
bravado, that Dzong cannot be replicated, ever.
Two
thoughts occupy my mind: one, that of pulling down the ruins to make way for
the construction of the new Dzong and two, that of the rationale behind rebuilding
a new one on the same location where the old Dzong stood.
I
thought long and hard and, whichever way I look at it, at the end, there was
only one conclusion I could arrive at. The act of pulling down the ruins and
clearing the site of the remains of the old Dzong serves no other purpose except
one - that of obliterating, forever, all signs of the Dzong’s close to four
hundred years of existence.
As
far as I am concerned, the perpetration of such an act can be defined in two simple
words: cultural insensitivity. For the only country in the entire world that advocates
cultural preservation as one of the main pillars of the philosophy of GNH, the
deliberate and willful eradication of this important historical and cultural evidence
would be nothing short of devastating to our reputation as a GNH country.
Without
doubt, we need to build a Dzong for the Rabdey and the people of Wangdue
Phodrang Dzongkhag. However, what is the rationale behind building the Dzong on
the same location where the ruins of the old Dzong now stands? How valid are
the compulsions of the 17th century Bhutan to that of the 21st
century modern Bhutan?
There
were warlike conditions prevailing during the time when our Dzongs were built,
mostly during the early 17th century. Dzongs served as fortresses
from where wars were waged and enemies were repelled. Because of its principal
intended use, they had to be built and located at strategic locations with commanding
views and impregnable topographical features. Making them as inaccessible as
possible was the primary design feature of most Dzongs in the country.
Unfortunately,
its impregnability and inaccessibility was the sole cause for Wangdue Phodrang
Dzong’s complete destruction. If it were constructed at a location with
multiple and easy access, the Dzong could have been saved. All our modern
firefighting equipment at our command, all the good intentions of a few
thousand people who thronged the periphery of the Dzong was not good enough to
save it from being razed to the ground. All because of one single factor: its
perilous location.
Mistakes
and losses are a part of life. What is important is that we derive lessons from
such occurrences. If anything, this phenomenal loss should teach us one simple
lesson: never ever to build our Dzongs and other vital structures on locations such
as those on which the Wangdue Phodrang Dzong was located.
Natural
and manmade disasters are a reality. Part of our preparedness to combat them
effectively must include a design parameter that accepts natural calamities as
something real and unavoidable.
…….. to be continued
This is unbelievable!
ReplyDeleteThe thought of changing the location of Wangdiphodrang Dzong is challenging and a thought provoking one.
I think there are lots to consider and as being a part of Bhutanese citizen, the formost validity of the proposal is looking into the majority of citizen's positive response towards rebuilding the Dzong. There is a chance that people don't want to change the dynamic and significant history of its location though renewing it also sounds a complete refreshing ideas.
Thanks for sharing Sir's opinion.
Waiting for the next post, wondering what possible reasons are there on the establishment of the Dzong.
Cheers!
I also feel that saving the present remains would turn out to be beneficial in many ways. It could be developed into a tourist attraction; we would have a green area which will be good for the environment and a state of the art Dzong in a new location. May be the Wangdue Dzongkhag could hold a referendum on this.
ReplyDeleteHi Anon,
ReplyDeleteCertainly we should preserve the ruins. I am current out of Thimphu but the moment I get back, I will post my third and final post on the matter.
Regarding holding a referendum on the issue by the Wangdue Dzongkhag, I think we have to remember that the loss is not theirs alone. As I said above, the loss is the entire Bhutanese people's. And, when we finally build a new Dzong in Wangdue Dzongkhag, the cost will be shared by whole of Bhutan. Therefore, I believe that if there is to be a referendum, it has to be at a national level and not limited to the views of the people of Sha alone.
My third installment will justify why it is in the national interest to build the Dzong else where - other than on its original location.
Yes, but a referendum I feel should begin from Wangdue for consideration by the nation.
ReplyDeletenot a bad idea
ReplyDelete