Thursday, August 27, 2026

Bhutanese Women: Unequal Among Equals

Early this month, a senior reporter – a woman – called me and asked my opinion as to why, despite the fact that women voters outnumber the men in every one of our Dzongkhags – women still lost out to males during the recent Thromde elections. I answered:

“Funny that you should ask me this - you damn well know that it is not only the Thromde elections – but even in the Parliamentary elections, women contestants have fared miserably thus far.”

“But why? What do you think is the reason?”

“Simple - because women elected Members have given no reason for voters to consider their candidature with any confidence or optimism. Actually, I believe that women do not trust women – they write them off as: Aamsu gii chikha michoebey - it is as simple as that”

“Come on, how can you say something like that”??? She sounded incredulous.

“Aamsu gii chikha michoebey” is not a fair statement – there is not an iota of truth in it. Regardless, what is true is that such a perception does prevail within the Bhutanese society – not because women are less capable than men – but because women elected Members have so far failed to demonstrate that they are capable of walking the extra mile – as opposed to their male counterparts.

We Bhutanese have traditionally been a matriarchal society – in their role as the Nungii Aum, we empowered our women with moral authority and family leadership – meaning that we treated them as more man than men. In every sphere of family life, the Nungii Aum had authority over most decisions – the male’s role was solely to gather food from outside – and plough the field - every other life’s decisions were in the domain of the Nungii Aum. We treated them with respect – we depended on their wisdom – we looked up to them for guidance.

But now, the modern Bhutanese society seems to treat our women as something less than equal to men. I cannot imagine at what point in our evolution we came to be this way. When, and what, caused the waning of our respect for women we historically held in high esteem?

I speak of this in the context of our law that provides that if a child is not fathered by a Bhutanese man, even if the child is born to a thoroughbred Bhutanese mother, the child will not be considered a natural born citizen of Bhutan. It appears to be of no consequence that the mother is a Bhutanese.

This is such a shameful law – it reeks of gender bias, it is unfair, it is uneducated, it is primitive, it is grossly incorrect, and it is an insult to our women. It blatantly promotes disparity among equals.


As good looking and healthy as they look - one cannot fail to see the sadness in the faces of these children photographed in 2009 in a rural village in Eastern Bhutan.

The fact that such a shameful law exists can only mean that as a society we are in a state of regression – whether we accept it or not. It should not be acceptable that such gender-biased law that treats our women as being something lesser than a man, is allowed to perpetuate. We pride ourselves as a mindful society, a society whose life and living are touted to be guided by the high-mined and lofty principals of GNH.

This is why I say that the women elected Members have failed their lot – they have done nothing to change things – to abolish this evil law. This is why I say that Bhutanese women voters hesitate to choose women over men. They do not believe that women have it in them to stand their ground – there is no past record of their legitimacy!

It is not as if we are unaware of the fact that it is the women who bear the unborn child for nine months inside their bodies – the unborn child’s umbilical cord is tied to the women’s womb for nine months. Therefore, there cannot be a shred of doubt that if biological purity is to be the determining factor, mothers, and not fathers, have greater legitimacy. Where the father is concerned, who is to know? We cannot deny that there is always an element of doubt – whether the father is actually the real father as claimed.

This law has the potential to create a serious long-term social disharmony. I am told that in one small pocket of Chhukha Dzongkhag alone, there are upwards of 3,000 unregistered children born to mothers who cannot name the progenitors of their children, or that the fathers are non-Bhutanese. We know that there are similar cases in other Dzongkhags across the country, leading me to believe that there may be tens of thousands of unregistered fatherless children in the country.

No doubt, these children are growing up facing whole lot of insurmountable obstacles related to their movement, education, business opportunities and, even worst, social stigma caused by their unregularized census status. They are bound to be growing up with resentment against the state - for the suffering and shame they bear – for a reason that is not of their own doing. I am told that some mothers, out of sheer desperation, have gone as far as to shamelessly name their own fathers as the father of their children. This is not a good situation and needs to be addressed at the earliest.

Women elected Members should begin to put their dainty feet forward and start to earn their keep and, in the process, gain the trust and confidence of their lot!

As early as 2010/2011, when I was asked to speak at some gathering at Kanglung College – sponsored either by the UNICEF and/or UNESCO (I can’t remember which one) – there were two lady MPs in the gathering. I spoke to them about the matter and urged them to take up this issue. But to this day I have never heard any one – whether women or men – broach the subject during the last eighteen years of Parliamentary debates. I believe that since this is an issue related to women, our women MPs should take the lead and attempt to bring fairness in our legal provisions.

For the record, it is not as if this is being brought up in the public domain for the first time. The matter was discussed earlier – please read up at the following:





I am fully aware that there is no such thing as a perfect world – but that is no reason why societies cannot try to strive for one.

I have said this before through this blog – that, to achieve greatness, it is not always necessary to accomplish monumental tasks – even being able to dismantle evil that go to bring ease and happiness in the lives of the ill-treated and the downtrodden, is greatness; that GNH is inconsequential – if you do not have GPH.

Please consider – we cannot claim to be a just society even while such a vile law exists in our country! Since the first time I traveled to the outside world in 1979, every time I mentioned that I am from Bhutan - it never failed to bring on a twinkle in the eyes of the foreigners.

Let us uphold our reputation as a country worthy of emulation!

Sunday, August 23, 2026

One Giant Leap For Q Yeshey, One Small Step For Bhutan

On the afternoon of August 21, 2026 at 2:08 PM, I photographed a strikingly pretty moth. Later, upon arrival at home, while looking up for the name of the moth, it turns out that I had unwittingly photographed a moth that is said to be endemic to Taiwan. I was intrigued! – I mean, what is a moth that is supposedly endemic to Taiwan doing in Bhutan? I delved deeper and I realized that I had a potential record in my hands. Material available in the internet confirmed that the moth was never before officially recorded in Bhutan.


Nothomiza flavicosta moth - recorded for the first time in Bhutan

I called up Karma Wangdi at the Ugyen Wangchuck Institute for Conservation and Environment (UWICE) - another Khengpa – one of the four authors of the most authoritative book on moths of Bhutan titled “Moths of Bhutan” – published in The Netherlands in August of 2022. I requested him to look up his records and let me know if the moth has ever been recorded before in Bhutan.

On the morning of August 23, 2026 (today) at 8.11AM, Karma Wangdi confirmed over the phone that my moth photo of Nothomiza flavicosta was indeed the first evidence of the moth’s existence in Bhutan. He said that he consulted his own records, including all of the published records in his possession --- he said that none show that the moth was ever recorded in Bhutan, before my discovery.

Nothomiza flavicosta is a species of moth belonging to the family Geometridae, commonly known as geometer moths. This species is said to be endemic to Taiwan. It was described by the English entomologist William Warren, in 1894.

For the record, when I went through my stockpile of moth photographs, it turns out that this was actually my second sighting of the moth – I was not aware that I had already photographed the moth - almost a year earlier, as follows:

     Moth Name : Nothomiza flavicosta
     Photographed at : Pangrizampa, Dechenchhoeling, Thimphu
     Date : September 5, 2025
     Time : 7:40 AM

Karma Wangdi tells me that Bhutan’s current record of moths stand at close to 2,000 species. However, he believes that Bhutan could be home to upto 5,000 species of these most beautiful of winged insects - collectively known as Lepidoptera.

Tuesday, August 4, 2026

Good Money Behind Bad "Torms": II

A reader of my blog commented as follows – after reading my earlier blog “Good Money Behind Bad "Torms": I

About superstition, religious practices and humanity. Your post is intriguing. Why are Torms poisonous to animals (thereby to also human beings)? And if so, why Dratshang and religious institutions have not cured and remedied to it? They hold responsibility for the damage and for not taking action. Thank You Yeshey for your investigation. Hope it draws the attention it requires.

Instead of responding to the reader individually, I decided to post my following response here so that others also have an understanding of the issues:

Most of the modern day "Torms" are no longer fashioned the traditional way. In the bygone era, "Torms" used to be sculpted using natural material that were safe, bio-degradable and environmentally friendly. The base materials were either kneaded dough of maize or wheat flour, or pounded clay, and decorated with natural fibres and colored with vegetable/mineral dyes or earth pigments. But these days, most of the "Torms" contain indestructible synthetic material and are dyed with toxic chemical paints that are harmful to the birds and animals that consume the "Torms" that are left out in the open spaces.

Around the world, problems of death of the wildlife caused by the use of chemicals, industrial/domestic paints, pesticides/weedicides/herbicides, pollutants in the water bodies etc. etc. have been reported. In some cases, extinction of entire species has been caused by the unmindful use of harmful modern materials.

Although it appears that the menace of the irresponsible celebration of Vishwakarma Puja has now been controlled to a large extent, Bhutan did go through a period of whole-sale dumping of the "Torms"/Effigies in our water bodies …. Please read at the following how it used to be done:
In truth, it is not just the "Torms" or the Vishwakarma Puja celebrations that must bear the blame for the defilement of our natural world – another unmindful practice that continue to cause even greater problems is the unfurling of the prayer flags.


Few KMs long prayer flags have been strung across the lush, green hilltop above Lungtenphu. It is my hope that those who are responsible for them had the good sense to use fabric of natural fibres and environmental friendly ink to print the prayers on the flags. Even if not, I hope those who are responsible (I get the feeling that it is a group or organization called GKOR - one cannot miss the four alphabets clearly standing out among the assemblage of prayer flags) for this act has the sense of responsibility to gather them up and dispose them off safely - before they cause the kind of problem they did in remote and far-flung places such as Laya and Lunana - as reported by VAST Bhutan.

The above is not the only case - just take a look at our green hillsides all around you --- they are poke-marked with similar prayer flags - thankfully not a profusion of colors as the ones in the above.

The problem has become so rampant that VAST Bhutan brought this to the attention of the nation through their “Lungta Art Festival 2026” early this year. Please read about it here:
At the most fundamental level, a religious act is supposed to be good for the soul, for the body and for the mind and, even more, for all the sentient beings of the world. But is that the case?

Bhutan’s urban literate are not even willing to forego the use of plastic shopping bags ….. I ask you:

What is the point of being literate if you are not educated?

Saturday, August 1, 2026

Good Money Behind Bad "Torms": I

Yesterday morning a senior member of our Chat Group suggested to me the following, during our chat related to birds and animals becoming too familiar with the human population:

“You are a lover of nature …. educate religious persons to propagate. I was told Thimphu has no Olas (Large-billed Crow) because of poisoned Tormas

It is rather eerie but it was as if some unseen force was steering me in some invisible ways. This morning, when I was headed to town, instead of using the shorter and newer road that is wider and better paved which would deliver me to Thimphu city faster, I opted to take the older and longer route that passed through Taba town. As I passed the forest between Taba and Lanjopakha, my attention was drawn to the following signboard erected on the shoulder of the road to my right. I stopped to take a closer look:


Thimphu Thromde's signboard at Taba

Underneath, in Dzongkha script, the signboard warned that dumping of other trash at the site was prohibited!

This has to be the height of religious fervorism! I mean Thimphu Thromde (Municipality) has actually allocated a special space for dumping of, what they prefer to call:  "Torms" (Effigies)! And they are categorical that littering by any other trash/garbage is prohibited. Imagine!!!!

I wondered – is it possible that there are other spaces around Thimphu where littering by "Torms" in designated places is legit? I drove to Motithang … and fair enough – there was one there too:


Thimphu Thromde's signboard at Motithang

I drove towards Chamgang …. None! Then I drove towards Khasadrapchu …. None! I turned back and drove towards Yusipang --- none there either. But look what I found:


A bunch of exquisitely constructed "Torms" dumped by the roadside at Memelakha

Some people had dumped some exquisite looking "Torms" by the road side about 500 Mtrs. before Memelakha Municipal Dump site! I was intrigued …. How come they came all the way to Memelakha but dumped the "Torms" few hundred meters before the city dump site? Why couldn't they have dumped them at the Dump Site just a few hundred meters above the road?

Then it hit me – the disposal of the "Torms" after the performance of the ritual is done with, is governed by some set rules – it cannot be done any which way you like. The direction in which the "Torms" can be disposed-off is determined by the monks or the Lam performing the ritual …. The location and the placement of the "Torms" is also pre-determined – you just do not dump them wherever it is convenient or wherever you please, or any place that some authorities command.

In other words, Thimphu Thromde cannot determine where the "Torms" can be disposed off ..... meaning good money behind bad "Torms"!

.................................................................................................................
UPDATE:
Today (14.08.2026) I located one more "Torms" Dump Site - this one at Dechencholing, at the point of diversion towards Dechenphug Lhakhang:


Thimphu Thromde's signboard at Dechencholing